Nova Scotia's immigration scandal (Oct 25, 2007)

Bolivar-Getson’s not the only one to blame

To say that Carolyn Bolivar-Getson was a disaster as Nova Scotia’s immigration minister is to state the obvious. After all, this is the woman who, as recently as last week, was defending her government’s indefensible, reprehensible immigrant rip-off program by arguing that those who signed up for the government-sanctioned, $130,000 “economic mentorship” program “did not have to come here under that program. They chose to do that and put their money up front.” Caveat emptor. Tough luck, fella.

The government had already quietly decided to refund close to $60 million — without offering to pay any interest on money it’s held for a year or more — to about 600 would-be immigrants whose money we took but who never got what they paid for. But Bolivar-Getson continued to insist that those individuals who’d had the too-usual misfortune to be mismatched with a mentor (like Iranian plastic surgeon Ali Shirazi whose placement was with a car dealer) or ended up not getting a job or opportunity in their chosen field weren’t eligible to get even some of their money back.

And, oh yes, despite the sickly stench of scandal wafting out from its rotting corpse, Bolivar-Getson blithely told reporters she saw absolutely no need for a review to find out what had gone so wrong.

She had to go.

But while Bolivar-Getson has to carry the can for what happened after last year’s ultimate collapse of the disastrously flawed and failed economic nominee program, she isn’t responsible for creating the mess in the first place.

Then-Premier John Hamm and his first Immigration Minister, our now-Premier Rodney MacDonald, must wear that one.

In December 2002, the province signed an un-tendered five-year contract with Halifax-based Cornwallis Financial to serve as the province’s “designated worldwide marketing co-ordinator” for its much touted economic nominee program.

Under the program’s terms, a wannabe economic immigrant had to pony up more than $130,000 to even get through the door. Close to $30,000 of that went to Cornwallis. More than a dozen other, initially unnamed but “approved” Nova Scotia companies not only got to skim $80,000 off the top of what was left but they also got six months’ free labour from mainly highly skilled, already economically successful would-be immigrants. We now know that at least some of those companies had connections to Cornwallis.

In the winter of 2005, Daily News legislature reporter Brian Flinn was the first to raise questions about the huge fees the program was charging. He pointed out that Cornwallis and its president were major donor to the Progressive Conservatives. That led the party’s chief fundraiser and apologist, Stewart McInnes, to lash out, accusing the paper of scaring off potential corporate political donors by making it seem — horror of horrors — that there might be a connection between such untendered, sweetheart contracts and a firm’s largesse to the party in power.

Could there be? Was there?

That’s still a good question and one that’s never been satisfactorily answered by Cornwallis or the government, which are now locked in a lawsuit over the province’s decision last year to finally bail on the failed program.

In fact, there is much we still do not know about how the nominee program — created in response to the very real need for Nova Scotia to attract more immigrants — came to be, or why Cornwallis got the contract without tender, or why there seems to have been so little government oversight on how the company went about matching immigrants with corporate mentors or what those immigrants got for their money.

We have a right to know what really happened, and why. And who was responsible. As do the would-be immigrants, whose perception of Nova Scotia must have been soured by their experiences.

Getting that information out, of course, wasn’t the purpose of Tuesday’s cabinet soft-shoe shuffle in which Premier MacDonald replaced Bolivar-Getson with Len “It’s-very-difficult-for-me-to-answer-any-specific-questions” Goucher.

The premier’s real goal — in advance of a legislature session in which the festering immigration scandal figures to be a hot topic — is to make it more difficult for the opposition, and for us, to get answers to those questions.

Which makes getting answers even more important.

Stephen Kimber is the Rogers Communications Chair in Journalism at the University of King’s College. His column, Kimber’s Nova Scotia, appears in The Sunday Daily News.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2007 Stephen Kimber, Website
  1. I just stumbled upon this and thought it was very well written. I find it interesting that although it was posted in 2007 it is still relevant today as I’ve heard Mrs. Bolivar-Getson is attempting to seek the party nomination again! Oddly, like the immigration fiasco, she also says she did not wrong in the expense scandal despite the TV and Generator found in her home.

    Reply

  2. Mr. Kimber,
    Your article was very thought provoking! However,I haven’t seen any more info. coming out from you regarding this?? As a non-biased reporter, I would like to see you investigate this further! I have never seen any info. regarding Cornwallis Financial in regards to who owns this company(principle shareholders), who is on their board of directors, their executive. Also, is their anyone in our gov. following the money trail in this affair?? Obviously, with the political contribution from Cornwallis to the Hamm gov. of the day, there has to be some connection to Mr. Hamm and this should be printed for the public to see. This whole thing smells of a lot of cover up and a lot of money going somewhere or to some people??? This appears to me to be one of the biggest scandals in the history of our province?? Lets see some more on this??????
    Thank You,
    Wray Burrows

    Reply

  3. Hi Stephen, Good story.
    Could I use it in our Dutch Internet paper http://www.de-muurkrant.com under the heading Nova Scotia-Immigration? I recently put the other news about immigration to Nova Scotia (with permission)now i would like to show the other side.
    Or more, what to watch out for.Greetings, Gerry Blom
    Editor De Muurkrant

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *